By Anonymous Radio Redux, Blackfox
The left and the right are both wings of the same bird. The dichotomy exists to control the opposition. Alex Jones once famous for rallying against it now sells it just as hard as his male enhancement herbals Infowars is famous for, but just what is it? How does it control us? Tell me, do you feel like you have options when you have to choose between Macdonalds or Burger King? That is the basis for this argument, that you’re not really choosing sides but rather flipping a coin.
According to Wikipedia (“Used in another context, the phrase refers to a political theory that alleges that members of opposing major political parties such as the Republican and Democratic parties in the United States share common interests and goals, as well as a covertly unified ruling authority over the political issues of the masses. The two major political entities act in concert to create divisiveness among the population while keeping control of the political spectrum.”)
Words like “manufacturing consent” really paint a picture. “Dialectic ….the Hegelian process of change in which a concept or its realization passes over into and is preserved and fulfilled by its opposite… development through the stages of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis in accordance with the laws of dialectical materialism ….any systematic reasoning, exposition, or argument that juxtaposes opposed or contradictory ideas and usually seeks to resolve their conflict. ….the dialectical tension or opposition between two interacting forces or elements.” -Webster’s Dictionary
Essentially the above can be summarized as a process of inventing a problem and anticipating its’ reaction by the public. Then the solution is presented as originally intended at problem phase. It is how so easily we accept surveillance into our lives, that and appearently you have nothing to hide… Opposotion is controlled, it must be to maintain the dialectic. “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” ― Vladimir Lenin. Controlled opposition means Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity for the Right, Rachael Maddox and Comedians like Bill Maher for the Left. All tow their party line. All sound the same. The alternative media has their own version of this starting with Alex Jones.
Whenever a political debate is had during election time, the candidates are actors reading a script. The end result is the same, “The President Select.” Anonymous Radio predicted Trumps presidency the day he announced he was running long before he got the Rep. nomination, unfortunately the recording of the podcast is unavailable due to losses. He certainly seems like a man to appease a growing demographic of antiestablishment types. His rhetoric was much the same as what comes from Maine’s governor Paul Lepage. “As goes Maine…” But for him to have won by a near landslide while having significantly lost the popular vote by far is a spectacle of western democracy, a reminder of how meaningless voting is. Presidents in the US contrary to popular opinion are not elected, they are chosen long before November. The elections are an opiate of the masses giving Americans a feeling of participation.
So based on the logic we use in breaking down the dialectic, what does that say about our current puppet in Chief? Could the evil Mr. Trump be the bad guy put there to scare the shit out of people who then would be more willing to accept what is next? We are undoubtedly approaching a whole new society with the progression of modern AI As mentioned in my last article. it is unlikely that service sector jobs will continue to be human operated. My personal theory as author is that some form of socialism is on the horizon, perhaps one that is not so social. Some form of at least social democracy will be absolutely necessary to mitigate the sociological ramifications of technological unemployment… or perhaps microchipping? According to an article by USA Today, it’s already being done. (Article here) Will a universal basic income come with conditions? Will the fear of government funded vagrancy and laziness and the necessity for subsistence require us to be tracked? Whatever scary future the so called “elite” have in mind, it is worse then anything Trump does. None of the Donald’s policies are different then the last president before him. His public image is vastly different, Why is this?
If we look at the events in society as random then it all seems like politics, but imagine for a second that they are not. If you see things from this perspective then it isn’t hard to question the official story about 9/11 for example. We must ask who has the most to gain from endless war. Read 1984 by George Orwell’s as a basis for developing your theories and the only possible conclusion is that the war isn’t going to end, ever… and that is the intent, to maintain endless control over the masses with fear and endless wars to justify an overfunded military industrial complex. Problem, reaction, solution. If the supposed terror attacks of 9/11 are the problem, then the solution is mass surveillance Ed Snowden style. The solution is more tanks, more bullets. The solution is the “War on Terror.” A endless battle against an ambiguous enemy which could be defined as any one of us. ANTIFA has been abled as a terror group. In an age of partisan politics, this seems like a fun idea because no one likes the ANTIFA side. Try not to take into account the ramifications of labeling a philosophy predicated upon the virtue of being against fascism as a form of “terror.” Wearechange is also considered a terror group. The Southern Poverty Law Center has Wearechange Maine, one of our affiliates listed as a hate group.
Stories like the Bill O Reilly scandal exist to feed the minds of the overworked normies who haven’t the time nor energy to dig deeper into media to see what the real issues are like wealth inequality in an age of automation, for example. These stories of course exist to maintain the dialectic by diverting that energy towards trigger worthy social issues. Energy is sacred, if your not crazy like me and you find energy limited, I both feel sorry for your lack of diagnosis and advise you to devote it to the things that would truly spark you to act if you only knew.
The matrix has us. Wake up! Vote for yourself, or vote for Anonymous… Better yet, don’t vote. Really, don’t vote. Don’t contribute your time. If voting is the pillar of democracy, then the freedom to obstain is as well. In Australia, voting is mandatory or you will be fined. If you don’t believe in an all encompassing theory about a rigged two party system then you can at least appreciate the need for more options and less stringent restrictions on third parties. Already only 55% of Americans vote according to this article by Statistic Brain. Let’s get that number down! Don’t participate, don’t be the problem, don’t contribute to it. If you want more options, then be willing to waste your vote, no more a waste then voting Clinton or Trump.